Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction Abstract and 1. Introduction 2. Experiment Definition 2. Experiment Definition 3. Experiment Design and Conduct 3. Experiment Design and Conduct 3.1 Latin Square Designs 3.1 Latin Square Designs 3.2 Subjects, Tasks and Objects 3.2 Subjects, Tasks and Objects 3.3 Conduct 3.3 Conduct 3.4 Measures 3.4 Measures 4. Data Analysis 4. Data Analysis 4.1 Model Assumptions 4.1 Model Assumptions 4.2 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) 4.2 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) 4.3 Treatment Comparisons 4.3 Treatment Comparisons 4.4 Effect Size and Power Analysis 4.4 Effect Size and Power Analysis 5. Experiment Limitations and 5.1 Threats to the Conclusion Validity 5. Experiment Limitations and 5.1 Threats to the Conclusion Validity 5.2 Threats to Internal Validity 5.2 Threats to Internal Validity 5.3 Threats to Construct Validity 5.3 Threats to Construct Validity 5.4 Threats to External Validity 5.4 Threats to External Validity 6. Discussion and 6.1 Duration 6. Discussion and 6.1 Duration 6.2 Effort 6.2 Effort 7. Conclusions and Further Work, and References 7. Conclusions and Further Work, and References 6.2 Effort This measure is not present in all of the experiments previously discussed, so we compute it (doubling the time duration of pairs) only in the cases where data is available. According to Nosek data [24] we observe a decrease in effort of 29% in favor of solo programming. Conversely, data of Lui and Chan [19] indicate a decrease of 4% in favor of pairs. Finally, Arisholm et al. [1] Report an increase in effort of 84% (against of pairs). In contrast, the results reported in this paper infer a significant (at a=0.1) 30% decrease in effort (in favor of solos), and an effect size d=0.64. Our results, again, reinforce those calculated in [24]. Authors:
(1) Omar S. Gómez, full time professor of Software Engineering at Mathematics Faculty of the Autonomous University of Yucatan (UADY);
(2) José L. Batún, full time professor of Statistics at Mathematics Faculty of the Autonomous University of Yucatan (UADY);
(3) Raúl A. Aguilar, Faculty of Mathematics, Autonomous University of Yucatan Merida, Yucatan 97119, Mexico. Authors: Authors: (1) Omar S. Gómez, full time professor of Software Engineering at Mathematics Faculty of the Autonomous University of Yucatan (UADY); (2) José L. Batún, full time professor of Statistics at Mathematics Faculty of the Autonomous University of Yucatan (UADY); (3) Raúl A. Aguilar, Faculty of Mathematics, Autonomous University of Yucatan Merida, Yucatan 97119, Mexico. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Pair Programming Research: Contrasting Results on Effort

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

11 Proven Solutions to Common GitHub Copilot Problems

Construct Validity: A Key Threat to Pair Programming Research

The Final Verdict on Pair vs. Solo Programming: A Summary

Reproducible Go Toolchains: What You Need to Know

The Science Behind Pair Programming: A UADY Experiment

11 Proven Solutions to Common GitHub Copilot Problems

Construct Validity: A Key Threat to Pair Programming Research

The Final Verdict on Pair vs. Solo Programming: A Summary

Reproducible Go Toolchains: What You Need to Know

The Science Behind Pair Programming: A UADY Experiment

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps